Poor Imp

Without sensing a thing, you cannot truely know what that thing is. True. But there is sense beyond mere tactile.

A scientist can only tell you what he has proof for. So if a scientist were to say anything, it would be something he can prove, or come very close ...

Again, I won't argue with you on that. However, if you were to separate all science from a viewpoint, this is what you'd be left with. And the science does ...

Though spherical, Lex (poor Pluto) has a point, I think - at least very keen in humour. I wonder how much time the fellows who demoted Pluto really have on ...

...too low on funds for the bookstore more than every now and then. !_! So library, of course.

I suppose then they'll want to be editing out the Tom and Jerry knocking eachother off cliffs, bashing eachother's heads in, chasing eachother with knives...? Cartoons, well, might as well ...

About the colors of indigenous peoples- my point wasn't to disprove god, it was to say that the religious explanation of the color of different people's skin was "god made ...

That's a bit determinist, isn't it, Reas? ^_~ Do we have a purpose that we will - come Hell or high water - fulfill whether we mean to or like ...

Well, for one, we can prove that the world is more than 6,000 years old. A Christian needn't believe it was less. Only an odd group, here of there, of ...

In many many many many many many many many many many many many more ways, science can disprove religion. How so? For the sake of discussion - how 'many-many more' ...

Oy, I suppose terrorists have been and are trying this thing whenever they can. It is a little disconcerting to think it got this far...

Oy, I've been mentioned. (Bob and all others - you deserved the wins. ^_^)

Welcome back, Jack! ...you've been missed.

It's where, yes? Got to be where...wherever where is - likely the same place this poll is, if that's anywhere. 0o'' A where is anywhere, at least; anywhere is a ...

float